Case 2501276/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Normand v Hmr Group Holdings Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2501276/2024
- Decision date
- 9 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Normand
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims about the respondent's absence management process, including the issuing of a first written warning after 47 days' absence in 10 months, of which 9 days related to his disability. The disability relied on was irritable bowel syndrome, with stress and anxiety described as factors that could exacerbate symptoms rather than as separate disabilities.
The tribunal dismissed the claims for discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability and victimisation. In the reasoning excerpts provided, the tribunal found that several alleged acts had not occurred as alleged, that some steps were ordinary absence management steps or were taken for reasons such as non-disability-related sickness absence or performance concerns, and that the claimant had not shown the required connection to disability or protected acts.
No remedy was awarded because the claims were dismissed. The prompt states that the PDF text was truncated, so this summary is based on the available opening judgment and provided reasoning excerpts.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising from disability under sections 15 and 39(2)(d) Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 39(5) Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim for harassment related to disability under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim under section 27 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- sections 15 and 39(2)(d) Equality Act 2010
- sections 20 and 39(5) Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- burden of proof
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.