Case 2501424/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Lamb v Cordant People — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501424/2020
- Decision date
- 16 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Members
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Lamb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs M Lamb was employed as a cleaner under a September 2015 mobile worker agreement that stated she had no permanent place of work and that the respondent would endeavour to obtain assignments while promising a minimum of 336 hours’ work a year. She had worked at the respondent’s Newcastle branch since 2014. After the March 2020 lockdown, she stopped attending work because of COVID-19 concerns; the Newcastle branch closed on 25 March 2020 and permanent employees were made redundant.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s employment did not end when the Newcastle branch closed. No notice of termination had been given, and the respondent’s 11 June 2020 letter confirmed that she remained employed. Because the contract did not fix Newcastle as her place of work, the closure of that branch did not amount to redundancy for her. The tribunal also recorded that she was later offered a 20-hour assignment at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Gateshead, which she declined.
On the wages claim, the tribunal held that the respondent was not obliged to pay the claimant after her Newcastle assignment ended. It found that the contract only required the respondent to provide the minimum hours over the year, which it concluded was satisfied by the offer of further work at Gateshead. The tribunal further held that she was not entitled to furlough pay under the government scheme because, on the terms of the mobile worker agreement, she had no contractual right to pay for the later period. Both the redundancy payment claim and the unlawful deduction from wages claim were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was a mobile worker with no permanent place of work, so the closure of the Newcastle branch did not make her redundant. It held her employment had not terminated and no notice of termination had been given. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had been paid up to the end of her Newcastle assignment, was later offered work at Gateshead, and had no contractual right to wages or furlough pay for the later period after declining that assignment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- s.135(1) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.