Case 2501633/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Yasin v SSGC Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501633/2021
- Decision date
- 1 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Yasin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr F Yasin brought a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages based on non-payment of accrued holiday pay against SSGC Limited. At the hearing before Employment Judge Johnson on 21 January 2022, the respondent was represented by an HR consultant and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal held that the complaint was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the agreed sum of £363.10 in respect of accrued holiday pay. The judgment records that this was a net amount and that the respondent was responsible for any income tax and national insurance contributions on it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described the claim as an unauthorised deduction from wages arising from failure to pay accrued holiday pay. It found the complaint well-founded and ordered payment of the agreed net sum of £363.10, with the respondent responsible for any income tax and national insurance due on that amount. | Upheld | — | £363 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £363
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.