Case 2501652/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Corless v Lyndon-Dykes Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501652/2020
- Decision date
- 27 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Corless
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment against Lyndon Dykes Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr D Corless’s wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £133.35.
The tribunal also found that Mr Corless was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages of £385.41 were awarded for that claim.
A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and the tribunal ordered payment of the net sum of £1,125.02. The hearing listed for 11 November 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £133.35. | Upheld | — | £133 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £385.41. | Upheld | — | £385 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered the net sum of £1,125.02. | Upheld | — | £1,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,644
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.