Case 2501681/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gary Fletcher v Nicholsons Sealing Technologies Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501681/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gary Fletcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Jeram sitting alone on 25 to 29 July 2022. The claimant was Mr Gary Fletcher and the respondent was Nicholsons Sealing Technologies Ltd. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the decision.
The tribunal dismissed the direct disability discrimination claim upon withdrawal by the claimant. It also dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, recording that it was not well founded. In addition, the tribunal dismissed the claim of discrimination arising in consequence of disability and the claim of harassment related to disability, both on the basis that they were not well founded.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The decision therefore records no basic award, compensatory award, injury to feelings award, interest, or total award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim. The judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising in consequence of disability. The tribunal found it was not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim for harassment related to disability. The tribunal found it was not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.