Case 2501708/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Robert Oyston v Council of the Borough of Redcar and Cleveland — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501708/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Mike
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Robert Oyston
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Teesside Justice Centre heard Robert Oyston's claims against the Council of the Borough of Redcar and Cleveland on 11 to 14 July 2022. In the written judgment dated 14 July 2022, the tribunal recorded that the complaints of harassment related to disability, discrimination because of something arising in consequence of disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and direct sex discrimination were all not well founded and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment related to disability was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of discrimination because of something arising in consequence of disability was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The complaints of direct sex discrimination were found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.