Case 2501949/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Burke v Eppleton Cricket Club — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501949/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Panel members
- Ms R Bell, Mrs C Hunter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Burke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Eppleton Cricket Club failed to pay holiday pay due under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, breached the claimant's contract by dismissing her without notice, and breached the contract again by failing to provide her with work during September 2020. It awarded £488.32 for holiday pay, £83.71 for the no-notice dismissal complaint, and £160.45 for the September 2020 breach, with the latter two awards including the uplifts stated in the judgment under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, age discrimination, and sex-related or sexual harassment. It also recorded an award of £139.52 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The total amount payable recorded by the judgment is £872.00.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Complaint that the respondent failed to pay holiday pay due under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £488 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Complaint that the respondent breached the contract by dismissing the claimant without notice; the judgment states damages of £69.76 plus a £13.95 uplift under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. | Upheld | — | £84 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint that the respondent breached the contract by failing to provide work during September 2020; the judgment states damages of £139.52 plus a £20.93 uplift under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. | Upheld | — | £160 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | The judgment refers to this complaint as sex-related or sexual harassment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £872
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.