Case 2501993/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Swan v OCS Group UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501993/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newburn Members
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Swan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of his pay, finding that it was not well-founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's claim under s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996 for constructive unfair dismissal, finding that it was not well-founded. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim pursuant to s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of pay was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claim pursuant to s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996 of constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.