Case 2502055/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Chapman v Peacocks Stores Limited (in Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2502055/2020
- Decision date
- 14 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Chapman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Arullendran made a short judgment on 14 February 2022 in case 2502055/2020. The Tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 26 January 2022, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not set out any separate merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment did not separately analyse this claim type; classification follows the case listing category. The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter of 26 January 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment did not separately analyse this claim type; this entry reflects the written pay statement category from the case listing. The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter of 26 January 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.