Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, Peacocks Stores Limited (in Administration) has appeared as a respondent in 6 employment tribunal cases, with £1,338 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Unlawful deduction from wages | 5 | |
| 02 | Unfair dismissal | 4 | |
| 03 | Other | 3 | |
| 04 | Working time regulations | 3 | |
| 05 | Breach of contract | 2 | |
| 06 | Disability discrimination | 2 | |
| 07 | Redundancy | 2 | |
| 08 | Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | 1 | |
| 09 | Sex discrimination | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3301330/2021 | 14 February 2024 | England & Wales | Miss R Rajbahak | Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Other | — |
| 1600145/2021 | 23 December 2022 | England & Wales | Mr J Nadarajah | Unlawful deduction from wages | £892 |
| 2502055/2020 | 14 February 2022 | England & Wales | Mrs A Chapman | Working time regulations, Other | — |
| 2502244/2020 | 25 March 2021 | England & Wales | Miss H Speed | Pregnancy and maternity discrimination, Redundancy, Sex discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £447 |
| 1801461/2020 | 29 July 2020 | England & Wales | Ms S Colman | Breach of contract, Other, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
| 1600496/2019 | 25 September 2019 | England & Wales | Mr N Evans | Disability discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.