Case 3301330/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Rajbahak v Peacocks Stores Limited (in Administration) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3301330/2021
- Decision date
- 14 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss R Rajbahak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss R Rajbahak's claim against Peacocks Stores Limited (in Administration) and Edinburgh Woollen Mill (in Administration). The judgment records that both respondent companies were in administration and that neither the Administrator's consent nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The Tribunal also recorded that, on 6 December 2023, the claimant had been given an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason. The claim was therefore struck out, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not separately identify individual heads of claim; this classification reflects the supplied listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not set out the disability discrimination allegations. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not separately identify the wages allegation. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not separately identify the contract allegation. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The supplied listing refers to written statements, but the judgment itself does not give details of that claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.