Case 2502062/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E McKee v Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502062/2023
- Decision date
- 5 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- Mr G Gallagher, Ms L Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E McKee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAfter a hearing at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 29, 30 and 31 July 2024 before Employment Judge Jeram, Mr G Gallagher and Ms L Johnson, the tribunal held that Ms E McKee's complaints of unfair dismissal, unfavourable treatment arising in consequence of disability, and harassment related to disability were not well founded and were dismissed.
The written record does not set out substantive reasons because the tribunal stated that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing. It records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment describes this complaint as unfavourable treatment arising in consequence of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The written judgment describes this complaint as harassment related to disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.