Mrs S J Grimes v Asda Stores Limited — 2024

Case reference: 2502282/2022
Decision date: 29 January 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Johnson Members
Panel members: Ms D Winship, Mr R Gregg

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs S J Grimes

Respondent

Asda Stores Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal unanimously dismissed the claimant's complaint of unfair constructive dismissal, finding it was not well founded.

The Tribunal also unanimously dismissed the claimant's complaints of unlawful discrimination because of pregnancy under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010, finding they were not well founded. The judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The judgment describes the complaint as unfair constructive dismissal and states it was not well founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Pregnancy and maternity discrimination	The judgment describes complaints of unlawful discrimination because of pregnancy, contrary to section 18 of the Equality Act 2010, and states they were not well founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	Pregnancy and maternity	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.