Case 2502300/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Steadfast Security Solutions Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2502300/2019
- Decision date
- 16 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Garnon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 October 2019, Employment Judge Garnon issued a Judgment on Withdrawal for case numbers 2502300/2019 and 2502301/2019. The proceedings brought by Mr D Hopper and Mr S Littlemore against Steadfast Security Solutions Ltd were dismissed after the claimants withdrew their claims under rule 52.
The judgment records no substantive findings on liability, no legal tests, and no monetary award. The extracted text does not set out the factual basis of the underlying breach of contract, redundancy pay, or unfair dismissal issues, and no remedy was assessed because the case ended on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text does not describe the underlying particulars of the claim. The proceedings were dismissed after withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The extracted judgment text does not describe the underlying particulars of the claim. The proceedings were dismissed after withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not describe the underlying particulars of the claim. The proceedings were dismissed after withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.