Case 2502319/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Dargue v Growth Capital Ventures Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2502319/2019
- Decision date
- 25 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Dargue
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The tribunal recorded that the complaints of Equal Pay, Direct Sex Discrimination, discrimination arising in consequence of disability, and harassment (sex and disability) were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim(s) would proceed to hearing on 5 October 2020. It contains no merits findings, no remedy assessment, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment referred to this complaint as discrimination arising in consequence of disability; it was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment referred to harassment on sex and disability grounds; this entry records the harassment complaint as listed in the withdrawal judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.