Case 2502546/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Mwarowa v Sunderland City Council and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502546/2023
- Decision date
- 16 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs M Mwarowa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out all claims against Sunderland City Council under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success.
The Tribunal also struck out the breach of contract complaint against Together For Children Sunderland Limited under Rule 37(1)(a) for the same stated reason. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that all claims against the first respondent were struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) because they had no reasonable prospect of success. The gov.uk listing identifies race discrimination, but the written judgment does not separately describe each claim against the first respondent. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment expressly states that the complaint of breach of contract against the second respondent was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. It also states that all claims against the first respondent were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.