Miss T Walker v Asda Stores Limited — 2019

Case reference: 2503304/2018
Decision date: 22 August 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Garnon

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss T Walker

Respondent

Asda Stores Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the tribunal dismissed the proceedings under rule 52.

The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the claims, no reasons addressing liability, and no remedy award.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment states the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it gives no merits findings or separate outcome for this claim type.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it gives no merits findings or separate outcome for this claim type.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it gives no merits findings or separate outcome for this claim type.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.