Mrs S Little v AG Wade Limited — 2019

Case reference: 2503402/2018
Decision date: 29 August 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Johnson Members
Venue: North Shields Hearing Centre
Panel members: Mrs C Hunter, Mr G Gallagher

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs S Little

Respondent

AG Wade Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal at North Shields Hearing Centre, before Employment Judge Johnson with lay members Mrs C Hunter and Mr G Gallagher, heard the claimant's complaints against AG Wade Limited on 12, 13 and 14 August 2019. The judgment records that the claimant was represented in person and the respondent by counsel.

The tribunal dismissed both complaints. It found that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded, and it also found that her complaint of unlawful sex discrimination for reasons related to pregnancy/maternity was not well founded. The judgment records no monetary award or other remedy.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Recorded from the judgment.	Dismissed	—	—
Pregnancy and maternity discrimination	The judgment describes this as a complaint of unlawful sex discrimination for reasons related to pregnancy/maternity.	Dismissed	Pregnancy and maternity	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.