Case 2503684/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Jayne McManus v Stockton Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503684/2019
- Decision date
- 11 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Teesside Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Jayne McManus
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Teesside Hearing Centre on 26 February 2020 before Employment Judge Arullendran, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mrs F Lennon, an HR employee. The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, so no merits determination was made on that claim.
The tribunal found the claimant’s notice pay claim well-founded and ordered Stockton Care Limited to pay £319.50 gross. It also found the holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 well-founded and ordered £324 gross. Both sums were stated to be gross awards, with tax and national insurance payable by the claimant.
The tribunal further upheld the claimant’s claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unauthorised deduction of wages and ordered £226.95 gross. It also found a claim under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 well-founded and awarded £693 compensation. The total award was £1,509.45.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was found well-founded and ordered to be paid as a gross award. | Upheld | — | £320 |
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay was found well-founded under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered as a gross award. | Upheld | — | £324 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unauthorised deduction of wages and ordered payment of a gross award. | Upheld | — | £227 |
| Other | The tribunal upheld the claim under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 and awarded compensation in this sum. | Upheld | — | £693 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,509
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.