Case 2600156/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Lawler v Merriott Chard Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600156/2021
- Decision date
- 16 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria.Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Lawler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 17 November 2021 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 1 October 2021 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing on 28 September 2021 and the hearing on 1 November 2021, which was to determine whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the claim, without explanation. The claimant also failed to make written representations, sufficient representations, or a hearing request in response to the strike-out warning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out'. Although the listing categories refer to breach of contract, disability discrimination, public interest disclosure, and unlawful deduction from wages, the judgment does not adjudicate or separately identify those claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.