Case 2600179/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Rai v Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600179/2022
- Decision date
- 21 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
- Panel members
- Mr A Wood, Mrs JM Bonser
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Rai
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 15 June 2023, with further hearing dates on 16, 19, 20 and 21 June 2023. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr K Rai, appeared through counsel and the respondent, the Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary, also appeared through counsel. The tribunal sat with Employment Judge Adkinson and lay members Mr A Wood and Mrs JM Bonser.
On 16 June 2023 the claimant withdrew all of his claims for harassment because of race. On 21 June 2023 he withdrew all remaining claims, described in the judgment as direct discrimination because of race. Following those withdrawals, the tribunal ordered that all claims for harassment related to race be dismissed and that all claims for direct discrimination because of race be dismissed.
As there were no further claims to determine, the hearing was vacated. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The claimant withdrew all claims for harassment because of race on 16 June 2023; the tribunal then ordered those claims dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The claimant withdrew all remaining claims, described as direct discrimination because of race, on 21 June 2023; the tribunal then ordered those claims dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.