Case 2600246/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Celma v Asda IDC — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600246/2021
- Decision date
- 7 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Celma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 20 May 2021, the Tribunal gave Mrs E Celma an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 7 June 2021 was cancelled and did not take place. The decision records a procedural strike-out for non-pursuit rather than any determination of the merits of the underlying employment claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify this claim separately in the reasons; unfair dismissal is inferred from the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify this claim separately in the reasons; unlawful deduction from wages is inferred from the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.