Case 2600420/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Denchai v University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust (“the third respondent” or “R3”) — 2026
- Case reference
- 2600420/2025
- Decision date
- 4 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Chapman REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Denchai
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Nottingham from 1 to 4 June 2026 before Employment Judge B Chapman. The claimant, Mrs K Denchai, appeared in person with support from Ms K Everett as a McKenzie Friend, and the respondent, University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust, was represented by Ms M Martin of counsel.
The written judgment refused the claimant's application to amend her claim. It then held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed the claim.
The judgment records no monetary remedy, basic award, compensatory award, interest, or other financial award. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal is not well founded and that the claim is dismissed. It records that reasons were given orally and does not include written factual reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.