Case 2600464/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Rooprai v Loram UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600464/2021
- Decision date
- 5 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phillips
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Rooprai
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K Rooprai brought claims for unfair dismissal and unauthorised deduction from wages against Loram UK Ltd. At a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Phillips sitting alone, both parties accepted that the claims had been presented outside the primary time limits. The issue was whether it had been reasonably practicable for the claimant to present them in time, so that the tribunal could extend time.
On the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal found the claimant's evidence about being told by Acas and CAB that she had 30 days from the ACAS certificate was highly implausible and unsupported by contemporaneous evidence. The judge found it more likely than not that her recollection of being told 30 days was incorrect. The tribunal also found that she had actively researched the time limits online and understood that unfair dismissal and wages claims had a three months less one day time limit, so it was reasonably practicable for her to have presented the claim in time. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
On the wages claim, which related to a single day's unpaid holiday pay for 26 March 2020, the tribunal accepted the respondent's case that the claimant knew about the annual leave issue in early April 2020. It relied on contemporaneous email evidence recording a discussion on 2 April 2020 about that date being taken as annual leave. The tribunal found the claim was also out of time when it was reasonably practicable to bring it sooner, and dismissed it for want of jurisdiction. No remedy was awarded because neither claim proceeded to a merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed as out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim within time and did not accept the claimant's account that she had been told by Acas and CAB that she had 30 days from the ACAS certificate. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed as out of time. The claim concerned a single day's unpaid holiday pay for 26 March 2020; the tribunal found the claimant knew about the annual leave recording in early April 2020 and could have presented the claim in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.111(2)(a) ERA 1996
- s.111(2A) ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- s.111(2)(b) ERA 1996
- s.23(2)(a) ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.