Case 2600686/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mr I Mussa v Al-Khair Foundation — 2022

Case reference: 2600686/2021
Decision date: 4 February 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ahmed

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr I Mussa

Respondent

Al-Khair Foundation

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the hearing on 4 February 2022, Employment Judge Ahmed, sitting alone, held that the claimant's complaints of ordinary unfair dismissal, unfair dismissal for having made a protected disclosure, unfair dismissal for health and safety reasons, detriment for having made a protected disclosure, and unlawful deduction of wages were all presented out of time. The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for those complaints to have been presented in time, and on that basis all of them were struck out rather than determined on their merits.

The tribunal did not finally determine the disability discrimination and victimisation complaints in this judgment. It directed that the issue of whether those complaints were presented out of time, together with the issue of whether the claimant was a disabled person on 25 and 26 July 2022, would be decided at a Preliminary Hearing. The full merits hearing listed for 25 to 27 July 2022 was cancelled.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Ordinary unfair dismissal complaint was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time and struck it out.	Struck out	—	—
Whistleblowing	Complaint of unfair dismissal for having made a protected disclosure was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time and struck it out.	Struck out	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Complaint of unfair dismissal for health and safety reasons was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time and struck it out.	Struck out	—	—
Whistleblowing	Complaint of detriment for having made a protected disclosure was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time and struck it out.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Unlawful deduction of wages complaint was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time and struck it out.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.