Case 2600709/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. S Fox v Inphase International Ltd and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600709/2023
- Decision date
- 21 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap Signed
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr. S Fox
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the complaints of direct discrimination and harassment relating to the protected characteristic of sexual orientation, together with the complaint of victimisation, were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. No merits findings are recorded in this judgment for those complaints.
The claimant’s remaining complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not disposed of in this judgment and was said to proceed to a hearing, to be notified in due course. The preliminary hearing listed for 26 June 2023 and the full hearing listed for 19 to 21 August 2024 were postponed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Complaint of direct discrimination relating to sexual orientation; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment relating to sexual orientation; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Victimisation | Complaint of victimisation; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.