Case 2600729/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Elizabeth Wiles v Alkota Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600729/2024
- Decision date
- 14 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Elizabeth Wiles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was dealt with under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal said the information provided by Mrs Elizabeth Wiles was enough to enable a proper determination of the claims and the matter was decided on the papers. The hearing listed for 15 August 2024 was cancelled.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's monetary claims. It found that Alkota Group Limited had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered £12,664 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £3,166 in damages. In addition, the tribunal found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,929, and it found that holiday entitlement had not been paid, so £730 was due.
The claimant had also raised an issue about unpaid pension contributions. The tribunal said that matter did not appear to be within the employment tribunal's jurisdiction and appeared instead to be a matter for the Pensions Ombudsman. It did not dismiss that issue immediately, but said any remaining claims would stand dismissed on 13 September 2024 unless the claimant wrote by then setting out the basis on which the tribunal had jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £12,664 gross. | Upheld | — | £12,664 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,166. | Upheld | — | £3,166 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,929. | Upheld | — | £1,929 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £730. | Upheld | — | £730 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,489
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.