Case 2600754/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z McLeod v Kurt Geiger Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600754/2019
- Decision date
- 6 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z McLeod
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Nottingham on 5 September 2019, before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone, the parties informed the tribunal that terms of settlement had been agreed. The judgment records that the Respondent would pay the Claimant, Miss Z McLeod, £1,000 without admission of liability in full and final settlement of all claims before the tribunal.
The payment was to be made by 26 September 2019. The tribunal then adjourned the proceedings for 28 days. The judgment also provided that if no further communication was received from the parties by 3 October 2019, the claims would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed.
No merits findings were made in the judgment, and no liability was determined. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Resolved by the parties' settlement terms recorded in the judgment; no admission of liability and no merits finding. | Settled | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Resolved by the parties' settlement terms recorded in the judgment; no admission of liability and no merits finding. | Settled | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Resolved by the parties' settlement terms recorded in the judgment; no admission of liability and no merits finding. | Settled | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Resolved by the parties' settlement terms recorded in the judgment; no admission of liability and no merits finding. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.