Case 2600782/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Cheuk Leung v Currys plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600782/2023
- Decision date
- 20 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Cheuk Leung
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing, the Tribunal considered whether the claimant was a disabled person at the relevant times. It found that he was disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of anxiety, depression, and a sleep disorder.
As a result of that preliminary determination, the complaints of direct disability discrimination, unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments could proceed. The judgment records no final determination of those substantive complaints and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing judgment only. The Tribunal found that the claimant was disabled under section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times, so the disability discrimination complaints could proceed; the substantive complaints were not finally determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.