Case 2600865/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Huseyin v Mayfair Estate Planning — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600865/2020
- Decision date
- 4 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Huseyin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 16 March 2020, the Tribunal gave Miss Huseyin an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why her complaint of discrimination on grounds of religion or belief should not be struck out, following non-compliance with Rule 26. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of discrimination on grounds of religion or belief. The judgment is a strike-out decision and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The complaint of discrimination (of all kinds) on the grounds of religion or belief was struck out under Rule 37 after the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 16 March 2020. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37
- Rule 26
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.