Case 2600945/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Leyland & Others v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600945/2018
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Leyland & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants, employees at Rampton Secure Hospital, alleged that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages by ceasing to pay High Security Allowance on overtime hours. The tribunal found that the dispute turned on the proper interpretation of collective agreements made in 2011 and 2014 and incorporated into the claimants’ contracts.
The tribunal held that the 2011 collective agreement protected only the annual lump-sum allowance and did not protect payment of High Security Allowance on overtime. The judge found that the 2011 negotiations, letters and briefing materials were confined to changes to the annual allowance and were intentionally silent on overtime because overtime payments were not then being changed. The respondent’s pay protection policy, which excluded non-contractual overtime, was found to underpin the protection arrangements.
The tribunal further held that the 2014 collective agreement expressly removed payment of High Security Allowance on overtime while maintaining protection for the annual allowance and unsocial hours payments. Accordingly, from January 2015 the overtime element was not wages properly payable, so the unlawful deduction claim failed. The judge also stated that, if necessary, she would have found that the claimants had affirmed the reduction by continuing to work without protest for over two years before the letter before action in March 2017.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned alleged unauthorised deductions from wages arising from the cessation of High Security Allowance payments on overtime hours from January 2015. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38
- Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896
- Adams v British Airways plc [1996] IRLR 574
- Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900
- Persimmon Homes Ltd & Ors v Ove Arup & Partners Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 3573 (TCC)
- Abrahall v Nottingham City Council [2018] ICR 1425
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.