Case 2601151/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Dinculeanu v Nexus Workforce Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601151/2020
- Decision date
- 22 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Dinculeanu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. Employment Judge Victoria Butler recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr A Dinculeanu.
The judgment does not contain any findings on liability, disputed facts, or remedy. It does not set out separate reasoning on the merits of the race discrimination or unfair dismissal categories shown on the case listing, and there is no monetary award recorded.
The only outcome recorded is dismissal of the proceedings after withdrawal. No legal test, hearing panel members, or compensation figures are given in the text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim; it does not set out separate substantive findings on the merits. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim; it does not set out separate substantive findings on the merits. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.