Case 2601296/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Beaumont v v Demain Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601296/2021
- Decision date
- 10 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Beaumont v
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 2 June 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing on 24 September 2021 was cancelled.
On the merits recorded in the judgment, the tribunal found that Mr J Beaumont was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded him damages of £720 gross for that breach.
The tribunal also found that Mr Beaumont was dismissed by reason of redundancy. It therefore awarded a redundancy payment of £720. The judgment records no further remedy beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £720 gross. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £720. | Upheld | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,440
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.