Case 2601354/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Dr M Benaris v Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601354/2023
- Decision date
- 9 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
- Panel members
- Ms F French, Mr C Tansley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr M Benaris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims alleging protected disclosure detriments, constructive unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures, and constructive unfair dismissal in any case. The tribunal held that a number of protected disclosure detriment allegations were out of time and that it had no jurisdiction to consider them, because it was accepted that it had been reasonably practicable to present them in time.
For the remaining protected disclosure detriment allegations, the tribunal dismissed the claims. It found that only one detriment, a delay between 16 July and 11 November 2021 in relation to investigating one protected disclosure, had happened, but that this was not because the claimant had made a protected disclosure.
The constructive dismissal claims were also dismissed. The tribunal found that the claimant had already decided to resign before the alleged final straw email of 29 December 2022, had not proven what the final straw was, and had not shown a fundamental breach of contract or a connection between protected disclosures and her resignation.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claims that the respondent subjected the claimant to protected disclosure detriments were dismissed. Several alleged detriments were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because they were out of time; the in-time detriment claim was dismissed on the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The claim that the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant's claim that she was constructively unfairly dismissed in any case failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- reasonably practicable
- fundamental breach of contract
- implied term of trust and confidence
- final straw
- affirmation
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.