Case 2601372/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Sargeant v Chinook Engineering Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601372/2023
- Decision date
- 2 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Sargeant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record shows that the case was heard by Employment Judge Adkinson sitting alone at Leicester on 1 and 2 December 2025. The parties were represented by counsel for the claimant and a senior litigation consultant for the respondent.
The judgment records that, after hearing from both representatives and considering the evidence, the tribunal decided that at the date of termination of the claimant's employment the respondent was the claimant's employer. No further substantive findings, claim outcomes, or monetary awards are set out in the extracted written decision.
The record also states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the form.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record only records a finding that, at the date of termination, the respondent was the claimant's employer. It does not set out any substantive claim outcome or remedy in the extracted text. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.