Case 2601446/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Penney v Eyre’s of Chesterfield Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601446/2022
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Penney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 21 October 2022 at Midlands (East) Region by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal upheld all four claims recorded in the judgment: it found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £706.28 gross; it found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,181.69; it found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,707.97; and it found unpaid holiday entitlement and awarded £105.95.
The written record contains the dispositive findings only. It notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The total amount ordered by the tribunal was £6,701.89.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £706.28 gross. | Upheld | — | £706 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,181.69. | Upheld | — | £2,182 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded £3,707.97. | Upheld | — | £3,708 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £105.95. | Upheld | — | £106 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,702
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.