Case 2601502/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Brandon Wardle v Ward Plumbing Heating and Mechanical Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601502/2024
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Brandon Wardle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment: the claim was presented on 15 August 2024 and the respondent failed to present a valid response in time, so Employment Judge Clark determined the claims on the information provided by the claimant. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages (£2,160 gross), had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract on notice (damages of £1,440 gross, reduced because the claimant took reasonable steps to mitigate and obtained equivalent employment from 11 May 2024), that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,100, and that unpaid holiday entitlement of £1,008 gross was owed.
A further claim relating to unquantified pension contributions (employee and employer contributions said not to have been paid into the claimant's NEST account) was not determined. The judge indicated that, if the arrangements arose purely under the Pensions Act 2008 auto-enrolment regime, the Employment Tribunal did not appear to have jurisdiction and the matter would be for the Pensions Regulator/Ombudsman. That claim was not dismissed at this stage but would stand dismissed on 20 December 2024 unless the claimant wrote to the tribunal setting out the basis of jurisdiction; a hearing listed on 3 January 2025 was to be cancelled if no such application was made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; award is gross. | Upheld | — | £2,160 |
| Breach of contract | Wrongful dismissal (notice) damages reduced to reflect mitigation; claimant obtained equivalent employment from 11 May 2024. Award is gross. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement; gross sum awarded. Listed by gov.uk under Working Time Regulations. | Upheld | — | £1,008 |
| Other | Unquantified pension contributions claim (auto-enrolment / NEST). Tribunal indicated this likely falls outside its jurisdiction (a matter for the Pensions Regulator/Ombudsman) but did not dismiss it; claim will stand dismissed on 20 December 2024 unless the claimant writes setting out the basis of jurisdiction by that date. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,708
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Pensions Act 2008
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.