Case 2601589/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Harris v Salus Care Group Leicestershire Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601589/2021
- Decision date
- 20 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a default judgment under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after finding that the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Clark recorded that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 21.
The judgment states that the claims succeed, but it does not determine the remedy on the papers. The claimant's entitlement was left to be decided at a remedy hearing, and the hearing listed for 19 November 2021 was converted into that remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not list the pleaded heads expressly, but the case listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the claims and the judgment states that the claims succeed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment text does not list the pleaded heads expressly, but the case listing identifies working time regulations as one of the claims and the judgment states that the claims succeed. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.