Case 2601590/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alistair Homer v Leedale Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601590/2021
- Decision date
- 24 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Alistair Homer
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Blackwell, sitting alone in Nottingham on 19 November 2021, gave oral judgment in this case. The tribunal upheld the Claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim against Leedale Ltd and ordered that respondent to pay £412.50 gross.
The tribunal also upheld a separate unlawful deduction from wages claim relating to operating a tipper against National CSS Ltd, which was listed as having the same registered address as Leedale Ltd. The Second Respondent was ordered to pay £190 gross. No written reasons were provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction from wages claim against Leedale Ltd succeeded, and the tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £412.50. | Upheld | — | £413 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction from wages claim in respect of operating a tipper succeeded against National CSS Ltd, and the tribunal ordered the Second Respondent to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £190. | Upheld | — | £190 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £603
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.