Case 2601594/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Hulait v Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601594/2022
- Decision date
- 6 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Hulait
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs N Hulait presented her claim on 13 July 2022 alleging disability discrimination and arrears of pay against Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust. The case had already included a separate disability-status hearing, and by 30 March 2023 the respondent had conceded that she was disabled by type 1 diabetes, asthma, anxiety and depression, ADHD and bronchiectasis, but not by emotionally unstable personality disorder.
At the open preliminary hearing on 15 June 2023, Employment Judge M Butler applied Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore and the Presidential Guidance on General Case Management, balancing the injustice and hardship of allowing or refusing the amendment. The judge noted that the claimant was represented, that the application was late and complicated, and that many of the proposed changes should have been pleaded earlier.
The schedule to the judgment granted typographical and background amendments without opposition, granted some amendments by consent, refused a number of opposed paragraphs as new claims because they related to pre-presentation periods or new factual allegations, and granted other opposed paragraphs where they were treated as post-presentation, sufficiently linked to the original claim, or a relabelling exercise. Paragraph 19, described as arrears of pay, was allowed on the basis that it clearly referred to the claimant being put on half pay.
The judge left time-limit and continuing-act issues for the final hearing, saying there was a reasonably arguable case only. The judgment did not determine liability or award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Open preliminary hearing on an amendment application only; the merits of the disability discrimination complaints were not determined. | Other | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The arrears-of-pay amendment was treated as a relabelling exercise and allowed, but the underlying wages claim was not finally determined. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- Presidential Guidance on General Case Management
- Housing Corporation v Bryant
- Ali v Office of National Statistics
- Reuters Ltd v Cole
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership
- Kuznetsov v The Royal Bank of Scotland
- New Star Asset Management Holdings Ltd v Evershed
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.