Case 2601708/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Jacklin v Seneco Group Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601708/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr T Jacklin
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Nottingham Employment Tribunals on 24 August 2021. The respondents did not present a valid response on time or at all, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages by non-payment and ordered them to pay £21,069.45 net. It also found that the breach of contract claim for non-payment of expenses succeeded and ordered damages of £813. Both awards were joint and several, so either respondent was liable for the whole amount. The total award was £21,882.45.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Joint and several award; either respondent liable for the full amount. | Upheld | — | £21,069 |
| Breach of contract | Breach was nonpayment of expenses. Joint and several award; either respondent liable for the full amount. | Upheld | — | £813 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,882
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.