Case 2601719/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Rolph v ISS Mediclean Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601719/2020
- Decision date
- 9 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Rolph
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss N Rolph's claim against ISS Mediclean Ltd. The judgment records that an order dated 19 August 2020 gave the Claimant seven days to explain why the claim should not be struck out because she had failed to attend the Preliminary Hearing on 19 August 2020 and had not supplied any explanation for her absence.
The Claimant did not make written representations, did not provide any explanation, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No findings were made on the underlying merits, and no remedy was awarded.
The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 09 September 2019 would not take place, although the judgment itself is dated 9 September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to respond to an order to explain non-attendance at a Preliminary Hearing. The judgment text does not identify the specific pleaded claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.