Case 2601754/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Eldridge Kumi v Swift Personnel Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601754/2020
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Eldridge Kumi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ahmed sat alone at a remote hearing in Leicester on 16 October 2020. The claimant, Mr Eldridge Kumi, attended in person and was assisted by Ms Dunne. Swift Personnel Limited did not appear and had no representation.
The tribunal recorded a single substantive outcome: the respondent was ordered to pay Mr Kumi £519.18 net in respect of an unlawful deduction of wages. No separate findings, calculations, or split of the award are set out in the written record beyond that order.
The judgment notes that the reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The written decision therefore records the outcome and remedy only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay £519.18 net in respect of an unlawful deduction of wages. The respondent did not appear or have representation at the hearing. | Upheld | — | £519 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £519
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.