Case 2601789/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Dr Frederick Dickinson v University of Lincoln — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601789/2018
- Decision date
- 19 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Lincoln
- Panel members
- Ms D Newton, Mr M Pavey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr Frederick Dickinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record states that the tribunal sat at Lincoln on 21, 23 and 24 October 2019 and 18 December 2019 before Employment Judge Jeram, Ms D Newton and Mr M Pavey. It records that Dr Frederick Dickinson appeared in person and the University of Lincoln was represented by counsel.
The judgment states that Dr Dickinson's claims for unfair dismissal, direct disability discrimination, and discrimination arising from disability were not well founded and were dismissed. The written record does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning; it notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The written decision therefore reflects dismissal of all claims with no remedy stated in the public judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising from disability dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.