Case 2601793/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Andrea Louise Sil v Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust — 2026
- Case reference
- 2601793/2024
- Decision date
- 1 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue
- Venue
- Lecester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andrea Louise Sil
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed Andrea Louise Sil's complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments, finding it was not well founded. Her complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. The consent judgment records no further reasons for those outcomes.
By consent, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust was ordered to pay Sil £21,000 within 14 days of the order dated 1 July 2026. The judgment did not apportion that sum between claims or identify any component breakdown.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The complaint was identified as failure to make reasonable adjustments and was dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was held well founded and succeeded. The aggregate consent award was not apportioned between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.