Case 2601798/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S D McMillan v Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601798/2020
- Decision date
- 15 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Welch
- Venue
- Leicester
- Panel members
- Ms F Betts, Mrs B Tidd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S D McMillan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing in Leicester from 8 to 15 October 2021, Employment Judge K Welch sitting with Ms F Betts and Mrs B Tidd unanimously held that Mrs S D McMillan's claims of constructive unfair dismissal and failure to make reasonable adjustments against Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust were not well founded and failed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the decision. No monetary award or further findings are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment refers to this claim as constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment refers to this claim as failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.