Case 2601888/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ben Curwood v Morgan Woods Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601888/2024
- Decision date
- 15 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ben Curwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ben Curwood brought a claim against Morgan Woods Ltd in case 2601888/2024. The judgment records that the respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim, or part of it, could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It therefore ordered Morgan Woods Ltd to pay Mr Curwood £1,399 net. No separate breakdown of remedy components is given in the judgment, and no other claims or remedies are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,399 net. | Upheld | — | £1,399 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,399
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,399
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.