Case 2601915/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul White v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601915/2023
- Decision date
- 13 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and found that Mr Paul White had been unfairly dismissed by United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust. The judgment records no other substantive claims or liability findings beyond that unfair dismissal outcome.
On remedy, the tribunal held that no basic award was due because Mr White had already received a redundancy payment. It also held that no compensatory award was due because there was a 100% chance that he would have been fairly dismissed in any event. The bottom-line award recorded in the judgment was therefore nil.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal was held well-founded and the claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.