Case 2602043/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Radia v University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602043/2023
- Decision date
- 31 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Radia
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant alleged that she was disabled because of stress and anxiety during the relevant period from December 2022 to 2 May 2023. The respondent denied that she was disabled during that period, and the hearing addressed whether the alleged impairments had a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities and whether they were likely to last at least 12 months or recur.
The Tribunal did not accept that the claimant's oral evidence or disability impact statement established disability during the relevant period, because the statement mainly described her position nearly a year later and gave limited detail about the relevant time. The Tribunal relied instead on contemporaneous medical records, which it found did not show a substantial adverse effect from stress and anxiety on normal day-to-day activities.
The Tribunal also found that, if there had been an impairment, the evidence did not show it was likely to last at least 12 months or recur. It concluded that any stress and anxiety were reactions to adverse life events rather than a long-term disability at the relevant time, and dismissed the disability discrimination claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal decided that the claimant was not disabled at the times material to the claim, so all claims of disability discrimination were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Equality Act 2010 definition of disability
- substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities
- likely to last at least 12 months
- likely to recur
- balance of probabilities
- Gestmin SGPS SA v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd & Anor [2013] EWHC 3560 (Comm)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.