Case 2602123/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Harte v Elior UK plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602123/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Harte
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued an unless order by letter dated 13 March 2020 requiring the claimant to supply information that had previously been ordered, by 27 March 2020. The order stated that the claims would be struck out if the claimant did not comply.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to supply the ordered information. On that basis, the claimant’s claims were struck out under rule 37.
As a consequence of the strike out, the hearing listed for 1 to 4 June 2020 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The PDF text states that the claimant's claims were struck out under rule 37 following non-compliance with an unless order. The underlying substantive claim types are not set out in the judgment text; unfair dismissal is included based on the case listing categories and claim type hint, so confidence is reduced. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The PDF text states that the claimant's claims were struck out under rule 37 following non-compliance with an unless order. The underlying substantive claim types are not set out in the judgment text; redundancy pay is included based on the case listing categories and claim type hint, so confidence is reduced. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 strike out
- unless order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.